This is a clear example of an area where consumers are suffering from a monopolistic grip over the market.
I understand it that they would not release any ink devices that fragment their product lineup beyond iPhone and iPad.
However, Apple‘s lack of action in providing quality reading experiences that reduce eyestrain and effectively Compete means that everyone has to deal with Amazon’s garbage.
I hate to say it but I think reading is a niche market. Not enough people do it, a lot more people want to watch YouTube then read Cormac McCarthy.
Reading is decidedly not niche in the US. Books (across all formats) are a huuuge market. They're roughly 2/3rds the size of the entire videogaming industry in this country, by revenue. The total annual revenue of the US book publishing industry is greater than YouTube's (but just barely).
except a huge portion of the reading market is from libraries and other free sources of content. Few people buy every single book they read new.
It's a flat-out monopoly. Amazon has a strangehold on the market. If you only had to compete on the hardware, then you'd see competitors. But you need to compete with the entire market ecosystem, which is very hard.
It's like the mobile phone industry, except instead of two unassailable players there's only a single one.
First they removed the page turn buttons, then they took a small step forward by releasing the Voyage which had pseudo-buttons (you could squeeze the sides of the device and it'd vibrate to give haptic feedback) so at least you didn't have to use a touch screen to turn pages, but then they released the Oasis which has a weird as hell non-symmetrical form factor which means you have to flip the device when you change the hand you are holding it with if you want to use the buttons.
Being able to push buttons on either side of the device to turn pages was one of the best "features" a kindle had over a conventional book for me. Not having it just feels like such a huge step back
You can also get a used Kindle Paperwhite for pretty darn cheap. I wouldn't recommend going to earlier Kindle generations prior to the Paperwhite, because they didn't have backlights which makes reading in low light conditions (like bed) a lot less pleasurable.
I really wouldn't mind having physical next/prev page buttons, though. Having to touch or swipe the screen is kind of annoying. I feel like that's a step back in UI from previous gen devices.
Smartphones initially had physical buttons that have gone by the wayside now, but at least their screens are much more responsive!
They are actively malignant at this point. They are breaking embargoes now[1], and clearly won't be satisfied until they kill traditional publishing.
I dropped Prime last year, and it was substantially easier than I thought it would be.
Since then, they've just kept doing disgusting, grotesque crap[2]. At this point, I won't buy anything from them. The whole site reminds me of that cleaning-product smell at Walmart - any time I'm exposed to it, I just want to leave.
That orangey-yellow color means a fight with an untrustworthy, grubby greedhead robot that consistently fucks up delivery and makes me deal with them some more. Who needs that?
[1] https://boingboing.net/2019/09/05/amazon-breaks-embargo-on-m...
[2] https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190807/20024842742/ring-...
Read reviews of the brand new Oasis, a $300 product featuring a micro USB port.
Amazon does not care about readers, probably because they drive so few dollars and the market is won.
Reading does not drive prime subscriptions, and anyone with decent product management ability and influence is working on something more important.