Re:The Spaceline: a space elevator alternative achievable wi...
by Tepix on Monday September 16, 2019 @04:53AM
(#20982203)
> This is maybe a get-to-geostationary alternative.
How would you use it to reach geostationary orbit?
Re:The Spaceline: a space elevator alternative achievable wi...
by dredmorbius on Friday September 06, 2019 @02:50PM
(#20898611)
If you can source materials in situ, this might be a useful way to create GEO platforms at lower cost than Earth launch.
Re:The Spaceline: a space elevator alternative achievable wi...
by logfromblammo on Friday September 06, 2019 @03:08PM
(#20898793)
If the theory is correct, you could build satellites on the Moon and slowly walk them to GEO at zero fuel cost with solar power.
Any circular orbit with height between 5% and 41% of the Earth-Moon distance could be placed more cheaply by flying out to rendezvous at 41% with fuel, then walking it back in along the cable with solar power.
The math suggests that putting a rendezvous base 41% of the way from the Earth to the Moon would be better than extending more cable down into Earth's gravity well. Meeting the cable closer to Earth would always cost more fuel. You could save fuel to GEO by meeting the cable further out, and then climbing back towards Earth. But every bit of extra cable you add on the Earth side increases the tension at the max-tension point at L1.
So just stop at the lowest-fuel rendezvous height, and add enough mass there to keep the whole cable in tension, but not enough to break the cable at L1.
(The L1 point is at about 84% the distance from Earth to Moon.)
The same type of material would likely be usable to anchor a halo relay satellite slightly beyond Earth-Moon L2, just by bolting it down to the darkest antipodal point on the dark side of the Moon.