Re:US city rejects $5.3M ransom demand and restores encrypte...
by msmerberry on Friday September 06, 2019 @01:54PM
(#20897961)
Yup that's what I came here to say. It might have been easier to take a higher insurance premium and let it pay the ransom than to do a restore exercise. Either way, bravo.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US city rejects $5.3M ransom demand and restores encrypte...
by VectorLock on Sunday September 08, 2019 @01:00PM
(#20911702)
There is of course the terrible secondary effect of encouraging more ransomware but the insurance companies can simply sidestep this by saying "we don't cover that."