Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Geekbench 4

Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee... by stefan_ on Monday September 02, 2019 @12:34PM (#20860140)

Well, they weren't better per dollar once you factored in power consumption.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee... by philjohn on Monday September 02, 2019 @02:02PM (#20860775)

For bulldozer, maybe, but pre core uarch they were faster and more energy efficient.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee... by antisthenes on Monday September 02, 2019 @06:02PM (#20862060)

Phenom, Phenom II, Bulldozer & Piledriver, all had worse performance/power.

Basically all of their CPUs from 2007 until 2014, a full 7 years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee... by philjohn on Thursday September 05, 2019 @04:20AM (#20884853)

Yes, as I said, pre Core uArch, which launched in 2006 for laptops and 2007 for desktops.

Prior to that Intel was on the dead-end NetBurst and Athlon 64 and derivatives were the better chip when it came to performance per watt and outright computational power.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee... by rodgerd on Monday September 02, 2019 @06:52PM (#20862293)

Are you factoring in the Spectre losses?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee... by nolok on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:58PM (#20863615)

Which also got majorly reversed now, intel uses way more power than amd for equivalent performances

[ Parent | on HN ]