Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee...
by sabas123 on Monday September 02, 2019 @12:48PM
(#20860276)
For people wondering why, it has mainly to with the fact that mouse polling rates are tied to FPS meaning that you still have heavy incentive to go above the FPS your monitor could handle.
Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee...
by PascLeRasc on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:03PM
(#20863423)
This video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjWSRTYV8e0) does a really good job explaining frame latency in CSGO and why you can benefit from running at FPS significantly higher than your refresh rate, and why vertical sync doesn't solve it like it should. The game is free now, so I'd highly recommend trying it out if you're doubtful about a smoothness difference between 100 and 250-300 FPS.
Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee...
by penagwin on Monday September 02, 2019 @01:57PM
(#20860743)
What? I've never heard this reasoning before.
The real reason is, I only really play csgo and pubg, I have X$ to spend on a CPU. Previously if you looked at them market, tier-to-tier amd vs intel - intel always was the stronger performer at the CSGO. Why spend X$ and get 250fps when you can spend the same and get 300fps?
Re:Dual AMD EPYC 7742 Crushes Quad Intel Xeon 8180M's in Gee...
by The_rationalist on Monday September 02, 2019 @07:59PM
(#20862625)
You have a 300hz screen?
Hint: it doesn't exist (for consumers at least)
Current max is 270hz I believe, but a few years ago it was sub 250 hz
So from my reading this "elite/full time" gamers will still buy an expensive CPU if they get 10 extra frames (but forget that in real life your PC has more programs running in background so reality may not match the benchmarks)