News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by BurningFrog on Sunday September 01, 2019 @11:48AM (#20852876)
> * imagine how annoyed astronomers would be if they found out the biggest most advanced space telescope in history was in space and pointing down*

Well, rumor is that Hubble was just a repurposed spy telescope, so astronomers probably should be annoyed :)

Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by billh on Sunday September 01, 2019 @01:39PM (#20853502)
Hubble wasn't but a pair of Key Hole satellites (KH-11) were.

https://www.americaspace.com/2012/06/06/top-secret-kh-11-spy...

Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by garmaine on Sunday September 01, 2019 @04:52PM (#20854810)
Hubble was built by the same contractors that build the Keyhole satellites. They whole idea from the beginning was to reuse the spy satellite hardware for astronomy.
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by Phlarp on Sunday September 01, 2019 @05:47PM (#20855183)
Almost everything is reusable between these applications, just need a flatter mirror. Which was also what they screwed up.
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by aedocw on Sunday September 01, 2019 @12:44PM (#20853189)
But we followed the making of hubble long before it launched. Why would anyone believe such a silly rumor when the development of the telescope was in the open?
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by willis936 on Sunday September 01, 2019 @12:51PM (#20853240)
What makes it a rumor? In the video Scott states that the “cost saving measure” of reducing the target mirror diameter down to 2.4m was to use the same manufacturing as these exact spy satellites.
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by BurningFrog on Sunday September 01, 2019 @01:44PM (#20853543)
Do you not understand that if a top secret spy satellite is gifted to astronomers, a cover story - i.e. a lie - will be made up about how it is developed by brilliant civilians?
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by mustacheemperor on Sunday September 01, 2019 @02:46PM (#20853960)
I understand you believe that but I don’t have to believe it myself and that kind of condescending tone isn’t really necessary here, especially defending a conspiracy theory. The existing publicized NRO grants, including the keyhole satellites mentioned elsewhere in the thread, suggest the simpler answer is more accurate. The Hubble development was heavily publicized through its lifecycle, including the repair after it was deployed. Why bother with such a performance when next time the NRO donates a satellite they publish about it for the PR?
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by akira2501 on Sunday September 01, 2019 @02:02PM (#20853674)
Likewise it should be understood that the more complicated the coverup and the more detailed the lies, the more likely that cover story is to fall apart.

Given the cooperation with the ESA and with the difficulties in grinding the main mirror, I find it far less likely that it was a platform gifted to NASA by an intelligence agency.

Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by oh_sigh on Sunday September 01, 2019 @02:49PM (#20853972)
You would need thousands of civilians to take part in your life then. Not easy.
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by chiefalchemist on Sunday September 01, 2019 @12:11PM (#20853013)
Annoyed? Sure. Surprised? Only the naive would be.
Re:What a tweet tells us about spy satellites [video] by alkonaut on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:15AM (#20859582)
If there was a 3-5m spy satellite I wouldn't be surprised, but if there was a 20-30m spy satellite (I.e. a project likely larger in scale and complexity than the ISS) then I'd be surprised.