Re:The design of littlefs: A fail-safe filesystem designed f...
by heyiforgotmypwd on Saturday August 31, 2019 @05:25AM
(#20845377)
Why not TFAT or TexFAT?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The design of littlefs: A fail-safe filesystem designed f...
by compressedgas on Saturday August 31, 2019 @05:45AM
(#20845430)
Neither of those are bare flash file systems. They both require a flash translation layer.
Re:The design of littlefs: A fail-safe filesystem designed f...
by pjc50 on Saturday August 31, 2019 @05:44AM
(#20845427)
Is that license-encumbered? Also, as it points out, they don't include their own wear levelling.
Re:The design of littlefs: A fail-safe filesystem designed f...
by delfinom on Saturday August 31, 2019 @09:38AM
(#20846188)
This is meant to run even on low-end micros without need for memory allocation. And support small SPI memory chips where you need to roll your own wear leveling across different size blocks of memory depending on chip vendor.