Re:Telegram moves to protect identity of Hong Kong protesters
by axaxs on Friday August 30, 2019 @10:54PM
(#20844372)
Then don't use so called 'secure' services that rely on phone numbers. There exist plenty of secure chat apps that don't have this flaw. LINE is probably my favorite.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Telegram moves to protect identity of Hong Kong protesters
by intertextuality on Friday August 30, 2019 @11:03PM
(#20844402)
Secure until the government asks.
Re:Telegram moves to protect identity of Hong Kong protesters
by axaxs on Friday August 30, 2019 @11:26PM
(#20844458)
Fair, but it's E2E by default, and only requires a (burner) email address to sign up. If you're careful, there's not much to be gleaned from the remaining data.
Re:Telegram moves to protect identity of Hong Kong protesters
by ubercow13 on Saturday August 31, 2019 @01:00AM
(#20844678)
Doesn't LINE require a phone number or a Facebook account? Seeing as Facebook will often ask for a photo of you to verify your account before you can use it now, this doesn't seem like a fix for the anonymity issue.
Re:Telegram moves to protect identity of Hong Kong protesters
by axaxs on Saturday August 31, 2019 @01:12AM
(#20844714)
You can sign up with a phone number or email address.
*Untrue. See comments below.
Re:Telegram moves to protect identity of Hong Kong protesters
by ubercow13 on Saturday August 31, 2019 @01:18AM
(#20844732)
How? As far as I am aware, you can link an email to an account once it is created, though it doesn't really do much, but you require a phone number to create one. Indeed their website claims you need a phone number or Facebook account. I just tried registering using the Chrome extension and it required a phone number.