News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dictatorship of the Small M... by TeMPOraL on Friday August 30, 2019 @08:14AM (#20837781)
Other pointed out to costs, but I think the issue here might be substitution.

An "organic" apple is a substitute for "GMO" apple; in fact, it's so good a substitute most people from the indifferent majority wouldn't be able to tell organic from regular apart if not for the label. There's plenty of types of products where removing gluten also doesn't affect taste too much. In these cases letting the minority impose their desires is essentially free.

Vegetables are no substitute for meat. If you like meat, if you crave meat, you won't accept a tofu replacement. This makes it more difficult for vegetarianism achieve total domination. However, the effect still manifests itself clearly. Where I live, 15 years ago, vegetarianism was this weird thing from movies that nobody otherwise thought about. Today, every restaurant I can find has vegetarian options available and marked in the card, and whenever friends or I organize a get-together, the number one question is always "do we need a vegetarian menu?".

Re:The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dictatorship of the Small M... by wsxcde on Friday August 30, 2019 @12:24PM (#20840058)
If the argument is that a majority will accommodate a minority as long as that accommodation is unnoticeable to most members of that majority, then I am totally on board with that claim.

What I'm trying to push back against is Taleb's ridiculously broad statement that a tiny minority (only as much as 3-4% of the population) will force the entire population to submit to the minority's preferences. This is just not true.