So, the first tutorial on the list that you recommend has this page for functions[0]. It's more or less the same as GP's link.

YOU are the one misinforming, it would seem. Granted, I don't work with perl (5, never tried 6) for about 15 years, but most criticism of it seems to align with my experiences back then.

[0] http://mvp.kablamo.org/basics/functions/

Edit: The second [1] also recomends the @_ method, and the third [2] the shift method. Did you even read your own links?

[1] https://perlmaven.com/subroutines-and-functions-in-perl [2] https://learnxinyminutes.com/docs/perl/ (search for subroutines)

From the Perl 5.30 documentation:

> WARNING: Subroutine signatures are experimental. The feature may be modified or removed in future versions of Perl.

https://metacpan.org/pod/perlsub

It's true that they're experimental, but it's extremely unlikely they'll be removed. The only reason they weren't stable in the most recent version of perl is because of some interactions with subroutine attributes (specifically, :lvalue) which needed some tweaking. We use them everywhere at Fastmail and they're great.

Which is to say: a lot of the reason they're still experimental is because Perl's commitment to backward compatibility. Other languages might have said "oh well," but Perl 5 said "oh, an unintended consequence that might break real uses in the wild; we should wait another year."

In my experience, I never got positional parameters to reliably work on Perl5. They were always buggy and would break with completely unrelated changes.

On Perl6 those are officially supported, so I imagine they work.