> As I see it, supporting Linux on a specific use case is not a sign of wising up, but a desperate concession to try to stay relevant.
Those are really the same thing, "wising up" and "trying to stay relevant".
Those are really the same thing, "wising up" and "trying to stay relevant".
If they didn't supported SQL server o Linux then no one would use it, as using MS Windows on VMs forces an additional premium on deployment costs.
As I see it, supporting Linux on a specific use case is not a sign of wising up, but a desperate concession to try to stay relevant.