News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thunderbird 68.0 by z3t4 on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @01:08PM (#20821729)
Webmail could work great offline if we could store more then 5MB on the client.
Re:Thunderbird 68.0 by inetknght on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @04:17PM (#20823587)
> if we could store more then 5MB on the client.

I recently stopped using Slack because their web client started storing 600MB in local storage. If gmail did that too, it would be the last nail in the coffin. I absolutely do not want random (or not-random) websites using my computer to store their data.

Re:Thunderbird 68.0 by zamadatix on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @05:52PM (#20824409)
It doesn't have to be "let every site store 600 MB or none can store more than 5 MB". Seems like a great thing for a permission really.
Re:Thunderbird 68.0 by inetknght on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @06:13PM (#20824593)
Not just a permission but a limit too. If I could set the limit to something reasonable, like 1MB, that'd be fine.
Re:Thunderbird 68.0 by jamesgeck0 on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @01:26PM (#20821932)
IndexedDB should be a solution to this, but it's not as widely supported as localStorage.
Re:Thunderbird 68.0 by zamadatix on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @01:36PM (#20822048)
96.5% vs 97.5%, doesn't seem to be the holdback any longer.
Re:Thunderbird 68.0 by z3t4 on Thursday August 29, 2019 @03:24AM (#20827470)
Could also use service worker to prime the cache. And generate static pages for each e-mail/thread.

New mail could be pushed using web push.

The problem is the outbox, how to send sent mail once user go online !?