News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by losteric on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @12:57PM (#20811884)
The way San Francisco and Seattle run affordable housing is just tossing scrapes to the poor so businesses can retain cheap labor. They do nothing to maintain communities, just token diversity.

Sustainable affordability is achieved at the balance of supply and demand.

Supply can only be increased by building upward and outward: increase density near jobs, and invest in effective regional public transportation to mitigate "Manhattanization" (extreme density) or "Los Angeleization" (car commuting hell).

Demand grows from increased economic prospects, so can be managed with progressive taxes (ideally reinvested in transit/education/job training that equalize economic opportunities).

Subsidized housing makes sense as an interim solution, a buffer as the market adapts, but those subsidies are ultimately unsustainable (requiring prescient central planning).

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by Nasrudith on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @09:42AM (#20819657)
How can they maintain communities exactly? I have seen many different definitions of that community to the point where I can't see a meangingful goal let alone an achieveable one. A bit like "ruining society" as a charge.
Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by losteric on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @10:12AM (#20819945)
Minimizing emigration due to rapidly rising cost of living.
Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by Nasrudith on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @12:45PM (#20821484)
That is a fair enough goal - especially if done at a whole city level. A complicated balancing act but well so are a lot of things.