>Substantial parts of HN think this is something that could be rectified technologically.
Well, until they manage to rectify that, it is. I will update the comment when that happens (assuming it's not so far in the future that me and those substantial parts of HN are all dead, in which case it wont matter).
>And there are a few species that are "biologically immortal"; lobsters don't have telomere aging, for example.
Good for them, but still not applicable to humans as of yet (or at any point in our past).
Substantial parts of HN think this is something that could be rectified technologically. And there are a few species that are "biologically immortal"; lobsters don't have telomere aging, for example.