News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics? by sk5t on Sunday August 25, 2019 @01:58AM (#20791588)
> English, more than about 400 years ago is almost wholly foreign

Are you suggesting this text is from the 17th century? I'm no expert but this much Germanic influence seems much older.

Re:Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics? by ithkuil on Sunday August 25, 2019 @03:09AM (#20791783)
Indeed it's much older:

"The poem is recorded in its fullest form in the Vercelli Book, a late-tenth-century West Saxon manuscript which was left in Northern Italy in Anglo-Saxon times. Vercelli is on the road to Rome; the manuscript was either abandoned or forgotten by a pious Anglo-Saxon pilgrim. An Old Northumbrian version of part of the poem also appears, carved in runic script, on the late-seventh-/early-eighth-century"

Source: https://www.arts.gla.ac.uk/stella/readings/OE/ROOD.HTM

Re:Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics? by bigfudge on Sunday August 25, 2019 @03:20AM (#20791808)
It’s Anglo Saxon, which much older. With a bit of effort a modern speaker can read Chaucer which is about 1300
Re:Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics? by dredmorbius on Sunday August 25, 2019 @08:58AM (#20792710)
I'm suggesting it's 1) English and 2) more than 400 years old.