News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cities Are Saying ‘No’ to 5G, Citing Health, Aesthetics, ... by Johnny555 on Saturday August 24, 2019 @11:19AM (#20787607)
Are you sure 5G is the only answer, or could your telco invest in more 4G infrastructure? (which they are probably reluctant to do with 5G around the corner)
Re:Cities Are Saying ‘No’ to 5G, Citing Health, Aesthetics, ... by toast0 on Saturday August 24, 2019 @11:53AM (#20787843)
Ignoring the problematic new spectrum...

If 5g is reasonable to run on existing spectrum (I think this is generally true, but I don't know if mobile devices are configured for it), and it allows for more concurrent use (this is the promise, yes?), and if there are sufficient deployed devices to make it useful, refarming the spectrum to 5g would be useful for improving user experience in the situation described. Most carriers already went through this with 3g and LTE.

You could invest in more 4g infrastructure in theory, that usually means adding more towers to shrink the cell size in congested areas; it's often the case that tower density is limited by municipal agencies rather than carrier budgets.

Re:Cities Are Saying ‘No’ to 5G, Citing Health, Aesthetics, ... by NikolaeVarius on Saturday August 24, 2019 @11:28AM (#20787674)
Spectrum is too congested for more 4g infra to make sense in some cities.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/5g-needed-to-ease-4g-lte-conge...