News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 2.5 Bn people can’t afford Internet access. Need your opinion on our solution.

Re:2.5 Bn people can’t afford Internet access. Need your opi... by kjs3 on Thursday August 22, 2019 @01:15AM (#20764855)
I suspect you're trying to solve the wrong problem: figure out how to deliver content at connection speeds these underserved areas can sustain. Not DSL, 4G, 3G...but GPRS/CDPD bandwidths (circa 56K-384Kbps). Dictionaries & textbooks can be delivered as text (or slightly more overhead, Unicode/UTF-x for multilingual), encyclopedias/wikis slimmed down, images downsized, many instructional videos can be delivered as something much less than 420p, etc, etc. More...you shouldn't need 2MB of JS to read the internet equivalent of the newspaper. Proxies/Gateways can translate. Make it efficient for people to access information at speeds that are accessible and affordable to their circumstance without the glitz/useless eyecandy and you could change the world.

Oh...you'll have to deal with all the folks claiming life-as-we-know-it-will-end if they can't deliver a dozen or two multiMB ads and gobs of clickbait to those 2.5B people, whether the users can afford to receive them or not. That's probably what'll kill the idea.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:2.5 Bn people can’t afford Internet access. Need your opi... by jibla on Friday August 23, 2019 @03:57PM (#20781947)
Thanks for your feedback. Shrinking content is really what can solve the affordability issue at some point. But still, internet fees are pretty high (according to average income) in many developing countries and also people aren't able to buy devices. But we'll definitely discuss your point!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:2.5 Bn people can’t afford Internet access. Need your opi... by kjs3 on Friday August 23, 2019 @04:23PM (#20782190)
Happy to discuss further if you care to. Helped build out cellular networks in less developed countries (LA) in my younger days and we looked at these issues. I haven't been deep into it in a while, but issues of high cost in these markets was as often as not a function of monopoly or other protectionism (i.e. there was often a government backed incumbent carrier or other government fees/tariffs/taxes that inflated end-user costs). So maximizing the content/bandwidth ratio was always a priority. The WAP protocol was one thing we thought would help, but it never really took off. Good times.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:2.5 Bn people can’t afford Internet access. Need your opi... by jibla on Saturday August 24, 2019 @05:52AM (#20786256)
Hey, thanks for your insight. The challenge we have at the moment is that we are not as technical as needed for this. And this might be a totally different direction for us, which is out of our expertise field. But I've heard you and will keep that in mind. Here is my Linkedin account (https://www.linkedin.com/in/george-jibladze-23923b17/)

I would be glad connecting with you and if you allow applying with some questions if we have any.

[ Parent | on HN ]