News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on Rust bloat by dmix on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @07:14PM (#20762940)
Even Raspberry Pis have many GBs of both disk and RAM and super fast USB, MicroSD, and network transfer speeds.

I don't really see the difference between 5mb and 20mb bins. And I'm a fan of minimalist OS systems like Archlinux with a slim set of running services. Disk space isn't really the main concern besides as a symbolic measure of cruft. No system is ever going to fill up space by having too many OS/terminal programs installed.

But I also don't come from the nostalgic Unixy C programming world. Just a Unix user. So I may be biased.

Re:Thoughts on Rust bloat by heavenlyblue on Thursday August 22, 2019 @06:15AM (#20766437)
>> Even Raspberry Pis have many GBs of both disk and RAM and super fast USB, MicroSD, and network transfer speeds.

You are speaking about _latest_ Pis.

Re:Thoughts on Rust bloat by dmix on Thursday August 22, 2019 @01:38PM (#20770532)
No I'm not. Pi 2 meets all of those requirements and has MicroSDHC which offer tons of high speed space even at entry level.

Besides that was an example, I have plenty of other IoT and embedded style hardware and they are all fitting this criteria.

Simply put the size of binaries has never been a real concern for some time now and the few rare cases where it might matter probably aren't worth all the effort made obsessing over sub 50mb bin size.

99%+ of it will be people who "feel" like it should be small, without any good reason.