Re:Sexism in the Academy: Women's narrowing path to tenure
by fzeroracer on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @01:13PM
(#20759173)
This was addressed in the article from multiple angles:
The first being that women have to work harder than men for recognition, and that they benefit less from co-authored papers with men (because it's assumed that the man did most of the work). There's also feeder labs with male PIs that are less likely to hire women in addition to sexual harassment potentially stymying professional growth.
So while none of these are directly responsible, each individual piece contributes to the systematic sexism women face and can potentially explain the gap.
The first being that women have to work harder than men for recognition, and that they benefit less from co-authored papers with men (because it's assumed that the man did most of the work). There's also feeder labs with male PIs that are less likely to hire women in addition to sexual harassment potentially stymying professional growth.
So while none of these are directly responsible, each individual piece contributes to the systematic sexism women face and can potentially explain the gap.