News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debug Adapter Protocol by est31 on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @10:27AM (#20757501)
LSP at least is implemented by lots of languages as well as lots of editors. There are long tables on the website: https://langserver.org/

Adoption wise, I'd say it's a success. As for how good the protocol is, I'd personally have preferred something binary instead of json.

Re:Debug Adapter Protocol by Entalpi on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @10:36AM (#20757613)
Been using it in Emacs with both Rust (rls) and C/C++ (clangd). It is glorious. I hope more people rally behind both DAP and LSP.
Re:Debug Adapter Protocol by lazyguy on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @11:15AM (#20757997)
Recently switched away from Anaconda to Pyls for Python editing on Spacemacs.

Documentation can be found:

http://develop.spacemacs.org/layers/+lang/python/README.html

Seems to work fine. Functionally it seems the same, maybe a bit faster. Haven't used it a whole lot.

Really tempted to try out the Microsoft PLS just so that I can say that I am using Microsoft in Emacs. Which is pretty close to being technically correct.

Brave new world.

Nowadays if I was forced to give up my Linux desktop and choose between Windows and OS X for work... Windows 100% of the time. Because I can then use WSL and get Linux nicely integrated into the base OS. Especially since Macbook Pros are not that nice anymore.