> There's an argument that it's actually not noble to let bullshit go unchallenged.

I like that he leaves it up to me to challenge the bullshit in my own mind. Sometimes I need to parse information with only one set of external biases influencing my cognitive process, instead of factoring in the interviewer's biases as well. They are likely both full of shit to some degree.

> That it's a tacit endorsement.

This is like thinking everyone should stand up for everything all the time. It's just silly.