Re:IRS budget cuts cost $34.3B in lost revenue from big busi...
by gok on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:12PM
(#20752201)
Audit based on size of underreporting? That's like saying only buy winning lottery tickets. You don't know how accurate a tax filing is up front; that's why there are audits.
Re:IRS budget cuts cost $34.3B in lost revenue from big busi...
by chris11 on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:54PM
(#20752614)
That was worded a little badly. The size of the company, and the size of the tax return should impact the chance of an audit. Intentionally lying on your tax return and saving 5% is a lot different with 100 million than with 10,000. The IRS should also prioritize audits that look fraudulent.
Re:IRS budget cuts cost $34.3B in lost revenue from big busi...
by londons_explore on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @06:15AM
(#20755927)
The mandate of the IRS should not be to maximize tax collection, but to maximize economic gain to the United States.
I hope their internal models take into account the cost of an audit which finds nothing, both to the IRS themselves, but also to the audited and their family.
In fact, to make incentives align, maybe they should even pay those who are audited and end up owing nothing.
That's not a strong argument against audits. I'd just take that to mean the IRS should mainly audit people or businesses based by how large the underreporting was.