News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by gnulinux on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @01:54PM (#20749831)
If you want to appreciate how strange real numbers are, check out Weierstrass function. It's a function that is continuous everywhere, but differentiable nowhere. In other words, it has a kink (i.e. a sharp corner) on ALL points.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_function

Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by joker3 on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @06:09PM (#20752707)
Are you familiar with Conway's base 13 function? It's about as badly discontinuous as a real-valued function can be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway_base_13_function

Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by gnulinux on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @07:39PM (#20753349)
This is fascinating. I vaguely remember this from a math class. Thanks for sharing.
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by ska on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @01:59PM (#20749910)
That is an example of how strange real valued functions can be, and one that tests your understanding of continuity.

It's a standard example trotted out in elementary real analysis courses along with Cantor sets, etc. If you have a good lecturer, they might make you try and come up with an example like it as an exercise before you've seen it...

A good part of becoming competent at analysis is building up a grab bag of examples like this you can throw at new situations.

Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by im3w1l on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @11:24PM (#20754336)
> In other words, it has a kink (i.e. a sharp corner) on ALL points.

x sin(1/x) is continuous and non-differentiable at 0, but I wouldn't say it has a corner there.

A sharp corner to me means a point where the left and right derivatives both exist but are different.

Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by wutbrodo on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @03:30AM (#20755197)
I don't believe this is correct. That function isn't defined at 0. While it does have a limit, continuity at a point c requires that the limit as x->c = f(c), which obviously isn't the case here.
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by im3w1l on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @04:35PM (#20761448)
So just define it to 0. You are correct but it's a minor detail.
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by OscarCunningham on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @02:26AM (#20754964)
Can a function have that property at every point?
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by im3w1l on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @03:16AM (#20755135)
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by proc0 on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @03:50PM (#20751245)
Looks like black metal band logo. Brutal function.
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by ska on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @04:30PM (#20751742)
You might also like the Cantor function, which is also known as "The Devils Staircase"

It is similarly used as an example, for a function that is continuous but not absolutely continuous.

cfL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_function

Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by lanstin on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:34PM (#20752454)
If you like these sorts of things, there is a slim tome called "Counterexamples in Topology" which is very long list of similar weird things.