Re:Open Location Code: An Open Source Standard for Addresses
by jstewartmobile on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @06:03AM
(#20745226)
I think triangles would have made more sense.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Open Location Code: An Open Source Standard for Addresses
by Tharkun on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @07:15AM
(#20745585)
The docs also seem to indicate that 3mx3m is the smallest grid they can address, but at the same they use addressing in slums as a use case...who has that much real estate in the slums?
Re:Open Location Code: An Open Source Standard for Addresses
by drinckes on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:26AM
(#20746106)
Hi - plus codes founder here. You can just keep adding digits and the area gets smaller. The way I think of it is:
+XX "house" (13x13 meters) +XXX "bathroom" (3.5x2.8 meters) +XXXX "chair" (87x56cm) +XXXXX "envelope" (22x11cm)
In Kolkata the NGO (Addressing the Unaddressed) are using +XXXX codes.
Re:Open Location Code: An Open Source Standard for Addresses
by meerkat14 on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @12:20PM
(#20748712)
Wait a minute. How are Kolkatans with (probably) cheap phones getting their hands on coordinates that accurate when phone GPS is usually only good to within ~5m?[1] I assume the postal workers are getting high end equipment?
[1] "GPS-enabled smartphones are typically accurate to within a 4.9 m (16 ft.) radius under open sky" -- https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/accuracy/
Re:Open Location Code: An Open Source Standard for Addresses
by WorldMaker on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @02:03PM
(#20759702)
First guess: Signs, maybe? You only need a few accurate surveyors and they could write coordinates in places. Use the cheap accuracy to get close then follow the signs.
Looking up the charity mentioned, they even have a nice photo of such a sign, so my guess appears validated: https://www.addressingtheunaddressed.org/services
Neat.