Re:Juul, Philip Morris Sued Under Racketeer Act for Targetin...
by losvedir on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @08:58AM
(#20746417)
Maybe it's more of a philosophical internal vs external locus of control thing, but I don't find this one similar to tobacco. It's easy to use Dominos and Burger King "responsibly". I don't find anything unethical about their business and wouldn't feel bad working for them.
Tobacco I'm less sure about, since I don't really know of anyone who uses it "responsibly".
Re:Juul, Philip Morris Sued Under Racketeer Act for Targetin...
by MaximumYComb on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @01:20AM
(#20754747)
I think it might be different if your boss is telling you to design an advertisement to target 4-8 year olds with junk food ads.
Re:Juul, Philip Morris Sued Under Racketeer Act for Targetin...
by losvedir on Wednesday August 21, 2019 @11:47AM
(#20758344)
Not for me, since I don't think it's unreasonable for a 4-8 year old to have Burger King. They just can't have it all the time, but it's a nice treat.
Re:Juul, Philip Morris Sued Under Racketeer Act for Targetin...
by simonh on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:01AM
(#20746441)
I don't see that as the same at all. They're providing a necessary service. People need to eat, they don't need to gamble or smoke.
Burgers and Pizza aren't the healthiest food in the world, but they're not the worst either. A typical burger consists of bread, meat and salad. There's nothing inherently wrong with any of those things.
This for sure. I had multiple friends work for Crispin Porter & Bogusky in the early 2010s. They're the main ad agency for companies like Burger King and Dominos. Great opportunity for them to begin their careers as designers, but at some point, all of them had to learn how to swallow selling diabetes to kids.