Well, if you get too big to get things done well, maybe not get too big?
> Well, if you get too big to get things done well, maybe not get too big?
I love this idea but my old history professor (who I pretty much disagree with on everything except this) used to always say "follow the money". What are the incentives that all the parties have for and against growing companies bigger?
You don’t want ‘bozo cliques’ to form, so you make a semi-objective process like ‘solve this algorithmic question’ as part of the interview loop. I think execs and the founders doing a final review before hiring all engineers comes from that fear.
Then other companies cargo cult interview processes from larger companies and the trend propagates.
If you want to ‘hack hiring’ as a smaller company, you should use hard to scale processes like the one described in the parent post.