Ok, I think I understand. You'll object to any woman-focused article that doesn't explicitly limit its topic to issues which only affect women, unless it also gives equal time to men for any issue conceivably shared by both genders?

Still seems a bit pedantic and defensive, but ok.

>Maybe you can find something better if you dig a bit deeper. I'm not entirely sure you wouldn't find something further back in my comment history :)

Not worth the effort, I didn't need to look deeper to find your particular bias on this subject, but thanks for conceding my point.