Re:Columnist asked researchers what they could find out from...
by nimblegorilla on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:15AM
(#20705375)
Security questions aren't really that secure anyway. A "real" hacker could just pretend to be helping out a friend after a debilitating accident and ask for everything to be reset.
Re:Columnist asked researchers what they could find out from...
by ggggtez on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:32AM
(#20705543)
Exactly, or the "crying baby/stressed out parent" example that made the rounds a few years ago. Hackers don't need to monitor every public comment you make, just trick 1 minimum wage call center worker for 5 minutes.
Re:Columnist asked researchers what they could find out from...
by worldsayshi on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:59AM
(#20705780)
The answer could be: "Don't allow answering anything but this exact sequence of words: " then followed by a string of words.
Re:Columnist asked researchers what they could find out from...
by paulryanrogers on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:21AM
(#20705980)
Perhaps we need a reset contact whom they can call to confirm with a real human.
Re:Columnist asked researchers what they could find out from...
by freeflight on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:22AM
(#20705997)
Like with nearly any topic on HN, an xkcd comic [0] comes to mind.
It's security through obscurity, with a bonus that the people who use this technique can't seem to keep quiet about it so it's not even obscurity.