Re:Uber, losing billions, freezes engineering hires
by dodobirdlord on Sunday August 11, 2019 @12:48AM
(#20666292)
These hypothetical employees are expected to be 24/7 on-call? If they're required to have their "pager" on and respond to pages, this is unreasonable. Nobody would put up with such absurdity. If they aren't, it's also unreasonable, after all, nobody would put up with such absurdity.
Re:Uber, losing billions, freezes engineering hires
by toast0 on Sunday August 11, 2019 @02:16AM
(#20666623)
Put in work preferences. Would like to work hours X; is willing to be notified of opportunities for overtime hours Y. When it's a big deal time, call up everyone who seems to be legal for DOT workrules, regardless of their preferences.
Re:Uber, losing billions, freezes engineering hires
by listenallyall on Sunday August 11, 2019 @03:53AM
(#20666959)
Awesome. I've put in a full day of work and I'm finally chilling out with my kids playing Xbox, can't wait to "immediately" get my ass back on the road. Not exploitative at all.
Re:Uber, losing billions, freezes engineering hires
by alkonaut on Sunday August 11, 2019 @06:43AM
(#20667496)
So long as the pay is good enough without answering any overtime calls (ie at least minimum wage plus operating costs for 40h per week) then I don’t see the issue with some limited voluntary overtime.
The q is: can the driver play Xbox with his kid and get him a higher education, with the pager off? Then it’s an ok solution. Otherwise not.
When a spike in demand occurs, a page goes out to all employees who currently aren’t on the road requesting that all those who can do so safely proceed immediately to an area that has unfilled demand.