Re:Companies Use Borrowed Billions to Buy Back Stock, Not to...
by ksdale on Saturday August 10, 2019 @06:39PM
(#20664929)
Every share they buy back is being disposed of by someone else, who is paying tax on their gain. The tax rate across all of the payees won’t be as high as it would be with a dividend, but it’s definitely not a tax free event.
Re:Companies Use Borrowed Billions to Buy Back Stock, Not to...
by tomatocracy on Sunday August 11, 2019 @06:05AM
(#20667384)
Buybacks and special dividends are economically equivalent. Buybacks allows individual investors to either sell or hold.
The majority of investors would usually prefer to hold at a given point in time (or at least would prefer a choice of when to realise their gain), so unless the sum is so big that a buyback is not practical, it is usually preferable from an investor perspective as it lowers average friction costs.
In some jurisdictions buybacks may also be more tax efficient for some investors than special dividends (and this may be especially true for senior executives who make the decision on which to do), but that's not the case everywhere or for all investors (some may have a tax preference for dividends).
If these companies made a large one-time dividend, would that be preferable to share buybacks?
On one hand, we have tax treatment. Dividends produce revenue now; share buybacks, only on the disposal of the shares. On the other hand...I don't see another hand. Share buybacks should be specially taxed at the corporate level.
Either way, companies returning money to shareholders is preferable to pursuing boondoggles. (I'd argue 100% of the buyback tax revenue fund basic research, but we know that's presently politically unrealistic.)