News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone. Parent comment

Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by solidsnack9000 on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:03AM (#20660074)
If there were clear and transparent -- like public -- procedures -- by which the FBI could get into an iPhone, it might be alright. Say that if they broke into the iPhone it was indelibly marked -- it flipped a flag in the hardware and there was no way to disguise it, and the OS would broadcast it over the web and over BlueTooth and WiFi, making it easy to provide tools that caught the message and published it. Then people lose their privacy, but only if the government is willing to defend in a credible way the necessity of it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by wellyeah on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:07AM (#20660090)
No, it's not alright. I'm sick of giving up freedoms every time some violent psycho/group of psychos decided to commit more violence.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by devoply on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:14AM (#20660119)
Other than all the other psychos who kill a lot more people but are considered legitimate in their doings... We need more access to their information, drug companies making opiates that kill tens of thousands, various other corporations, various world leaders... etc. If we can tolerate them, then we can tolerate your run of the mill psycho doing things now and then and usually immediately being stopped from doing anything else.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by AmphibianTree on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:39AM (#20660205)
Please try to use a different example. I have CRPS, the most painful disease known to man, and have not been prescribed any analgesics two years in because of fear around opioids. You might think you’re excluding my ilk when examples like this are used but you’re not in practice...Just trading tragedy you know for tragedy I hope you never learn about. Almost exactly like the freedom from unreasonable searches. Ty
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by nickpsecurity on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:26AM (#20660160)
I'd actually like to see that argument used more often. The ones they tolerate kill in larger numbers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by solidsnack9000 on Saturday August 10, 2019 @01:40PM (#20663438)
Let's all remember this post when it comes to vote for one of those Democrats who wants to take our guns away.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by tathougies on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:23AM (#20660149)
No thanks. I live in america and the fifth amendment means I am never under obligation to incriminate myself.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by solidsnack9000 on Saturday August 10, 2019 @01:40PM (#20663443)
But a simple counter-amendment could fix that, just like with the 2nd Amendment.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by willis936 on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:05AM (#20660079)
If I were a large entity trying to secretly access a device I think I would keep it in a Faraday cage.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by topmonk on Saturday August 10, 2019 @12:10AM (#20660102)
How about a dated signed explanation that had to passed around and signed by a bunch of public institutions. Heck, to keep other countries from complaining, some could be an international.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FBI tells lawmakers it can't access Dayton gunman's phone by solidsnack9000 on Saturday August 10, 2019 @02:55PM (#20663867)
In a way I am glad to see the thorough rejection of my comment.
[ Parent | on HN ]