Re:Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
by colejohnson66 on Friday August 09, 2019 @05:28PM
(#20658364)
Maybe because it’s not a scam and just not a profitable business venture?
Re:Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
by staticautomatic on Friday August 09, 2019 @07:26PM
(#20659034)
Perhaps. But I think there's a genuine question about whether it was ever reasonable to believe that Uber was going to become a profitable company. Most of the claims I read/heard that there was a legitimate path to profitability amounted to "something something on a long enough timeline something something." We may well never find out if those claims are true. After Uber is dead I'm sure there will be many wishful retrospectives full of counterfactual arguments about "if only Uber had done such and such instead," but we'll never know if those are true, either.
Re:Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
by CamelCaseName on Friday August 09, 2019 @10:00PM
(#20659694)
I'm not sure why Uber wouldn't be successful. After all, taxis were a profitable enterprise for millennia.
Uber faces lower costs, and they have scale which allows them to have better targeted offers, surges, and advertising.
I noticed that they spent $3B in R&D last quarter. Presumably a lot of that is going into driverless vehicles. Exclude half of that cost, and exclude their one time IPO related costs, and they're profitable.
It's bizarre to see such a blatant scam being run out in the open. People used to have shame.