I'm being very specific in what has gone wrong and it has nothing to do with the climate. Hitting me with a ton of links that have nothing to do with my main argument is irrelevant. Downvoting also does nothing more than proving my point further.
Science is little more than another papacy to the eyes of many and public discourse is slightly better than a Mad-Max pit. Under these conditions I regret that I even bothered. Good luck resolving this.
> I'm being very specific in what has gone wrong and it has nothing to do with the climate
I don't see any argument or proof there apart of "scientists lie"
...scientific bodies that have chipped away their credibility...
I don't understand why it is so hard to get my message across. Perhaps it's my English (not a native speaker) or maybe the crowd in here finds it very hard to look the sorry state of science atm mostly because they feel invested in it one way or another.
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-wo...
More data, and reference to IPCC, who consistently err on the conservative side, over the years:
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/sc...
https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
So where is the controversy?