Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ...
by badrabbit on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @08:52PM
(#20631077)
It's more like in the 90s and 2000s software-exploit based attacks were fairly easy. These days you have to adopt and use logical,social and configuration vulnerabilities that have always been common as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ...
by tinco on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @03:29AM
(#20632645)
Imagine the damage those ransomware people could have done back then.. Whole countries were open for disruption.
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ...
by pjmlp on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @04:53AM
(#20632986)
Given that Morris Worm is 30 years old and we keep using UNIX derived OSes, those ransomware people have plenty of opportunities still.
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ...
by smhenderson on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @02:07PM
(#20637249)
But surely there are a much smaller number of Unix computers running sendmail these days? And sendmail is a lot more secure now than it was 30 years ago. Doesn't seem like a fair comparison IMHO...
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ...
by pjmlp on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @04:57PM
(#20638972)
Enjoy the Google talks from Linux Kernel Summit 2018.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfNt6MsLj0E&list=PLbzoR-pLrL...
68% of Linux kernel exploits in 2018 were caused by C's lack of features to handle memory corruption.