News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by Siecje on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @08:48AM (#20624625)
I have a few drives with video files and I use Backblaze for Windows. But there is no local redundancy. What is a better solution?
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by atYevP on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @10:54AM (#20625672)
Yev from Backblaze here -> If you have a lot of data (over 4TB) I'd recommend a local NAS or a simple Drobo to hold the data locally in addition to Backblaze for the computer. If you get a NAS we're integrated with a few NAS vendors with B2 cloud Storage so you can also have those NAS systems directly moving data to B2 as well (separate cost structure - but good stuff).
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by Siecje on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @04:22PM (#20629163)
Are you saying to have a copy on the computer and also a NAS? How do you keep them in sync?

With 4TB and the price being $0.005/GB per month[0] that's $20 per month.

0: https://www.backblaze.com/business-nas-backup.html

Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by bristleworm on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @09:54AM (#20625161)
All my data is on a Synology NAS. Can't think of anything better.
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by decoyworker on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @10:15AM (#20625336)
I was considering picking up one of these but they seem incredibly overpriced for the specs listed.
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by vel0city on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @12:03PM (#20626400)
When you're buying a Synology you're not just buying hardware but also a pretty dang solid software suite. I've used several NAS products along with FreeNAS, Windows File Services, and plain old Samba. Synology has always been just about the easiest to use with excellent mobile and web apps for accessing your files on the go. It all depends on what you're really wanting out of your NAS.
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by rufio on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @11:22AM (#20625929)
in my experience it's really really really worth it, though.
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by Siecje on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @10:12AM (#20625308)
Do you have an online/off-site backup?
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by rufio on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @11:22AM (#20625936)
(not OP) I have three of them (two off site backing up the primary) and it works great once you get it all set up!
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by kogir on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @11:08AM (#20625818)
On Windows, Storage Spaces works pretty well.
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by OedipusRex on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @09:36AM (#20625006)
RAID
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by pnutjam on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @10:12AM (#20625304)
RAID give you in time redundancy, so your system doesn't fail while your working.

Most home users don't need this, it's cheaper and better to sync to a 2nd drive nightly. This gives you a local backup and redundancy, because you can swap to that drive if your first drive fails. If you're doing RAID, you still need a local and offsite backup.

Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by Siecje on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @10:13AM (#20625315)
How do you sync nightly? If a file is corrupted or a bit is flipped are you copying over a good copy?
Re:Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q2 2019 by pnutjam on Tuesday August 06, 2019 @06:26PM (#20630299)
I sync on linux, btrfs lets me take snapshots after each sync. I currently use rsync, but I'm thinking of setting my primary drive to btrfs so I can use btrfs sync.

I used to do this with windows. Yeah, if you have corruption, you copy it, but so does a raid? At least this way your safe from fat finger errors and you have a quick access backup.