News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:8chan goes dark after hardware provider discontinues service by spookthesunset on Monday August 05, 2019 @04:07PM (#20618322)
It solves one thing though. It protects the business with the platform from getting their brand tarnished by whoever they kicked off. That alone is enough reason to allow a private business to kick somebody off their platform.

Surely you'd have an issue if the government showed up at a businesses office with guns and forced the owner (at gunpoint!) to allow a nazi hate site to continue to exist on their platform, eh? Cause that is what you are arguing for.

Re:8chan goes dark after hardware provider discontinues service by afiori on Monday August 05, 2019 @04:22PM (#20618500)
> Surely you'd have an issue if the government showed up at a businesses office with guns and forced the owner (at gunpoint!) to allow a nazi hate site to continue to exist on their platform.

Not the point, but even still what people are arguing against is mobs of internet users pressuring companies into political decisions.

Literally (as in figuratively) the people asking for banning the site are the one holding the owner at gunpoint asking for the termination of a business relationship.

Re:8chan goes dark after hardware provider discontinues service by manigandham on Monday August 05, 2019 @04:11PM (#20618374)
Nobody is arguing that. The companies have a right to do what they want. We’re saying it will solve nothing.

The PR benefits you're claiming only exist because it placates the very same people that make such an outrage and call for corporate action in the first place.