Re:Should Rivers Have Same Legal Rights as Humans? Growing N...
by closeparen on Monday August 05, 2019 @01:47AM
(#20611582)
If a policy would have prevented something we now enjoy from emerging in the past, we should at least be concerned about what it might suppress tomorrow.
Total environmental damage would be a lot worse if the populations of skyscraper cities were instead scattered across a broader, less intense sprawl. Environmental regulation can sometime be counterproductive that way.
"This policy would've been bad in the past" not an argument against that policy now, especially ~180 yrs later.
Also, why is an alternate reality without Chicago a nightmare scenario?