I think this is stretching the stated intent of the Electoral College to the point of being disingenuous. The framers did want "land" to affect presidential election, but not because they wanted the land itself to be a separate legal entity.

Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

I never said they wanted land to be a separate entity but rather they sought to take into account geographic interests and not just individual ones when writing the constitution

Agreed, but "geographic interests" was an economic distinction. I don't see how it has any relationship to the original article, which is about giving rights to literal pieces of the Earth.

Because the first step in the law recognizing something has rights is first realizing they have interests to be protected.