What happens if all other providers refuse you as well on same basis? What if Comcast refuse you to provide any internet service because they don't like your views on net neutrality?

In my personal opinion, the size of "all others" matters.

If you have a monopolistic ISP that refuses to provide service to you because they don't like your content, and they're your only option, then that's a problem.

If you have multiple tens of CDN providers and they all don't want to carry your content, then perhaps you should really take a look at your content and have a hard think about why it isn't wanted.

And regardless, a CDN isn't necessary to host a website. A CDN certainly makes it easier to achieve lower-latency global reach, and is useful in helping you weather certain types of attacks on your infrastructure, but they're by no means required. And there are other ways to achieve those goals.

Exactly, with similarity being a second important thing. For example, maybe you’re lucky enough to have three ISPs to choose from, but they’re all big American companies with nearly identical corporate cultures, and odds are good that if one of them kicks you off, the others will too.

Hosting a site, on the other hand, has a multitude of very different providers to choose from. Even if you manage to get banned from every hosting provider in the US, ship a server to a colo in Kyrgyzstan or whatever, and keep right on going.

Cloudflare isn’t an ISP so “all other providers” doesn’t make sense, and Comcast isn’t a competitor.

I guess then you'd have to reflect on the kind of content you're promoting if the entire internet hates you for it.

A few key decision makers in key roles in IT infrastructure do not represent the entire internet.

If you can't get anyone to host your content that's a big enough sample for me.

You obviously haven't seen group-think in action.

Telecom companies like AT&T aren't providing "essential service". Being able to call/text someone is not a "essential service". Yet they are not supposed to ban people because they are merely the carrier.

> Telecom companies like AT&T aren't providing "essential service".

...according to Title II, yes, they absolutely are.

https://newnetworks.com/titleii/

The FCC just ruled that Internet service is not a Title II service.

It's not Internet service that's essential: it's phone service - the ability to make emergency phone calls.

Being able to call people is pretty essential in the modern world. That’s why these laws exist and why governments have put so much effort into making these services available to everyone.

The phone company is required to serve you even if they disagree with you not because of some high-minded ideas about free speech, but because it’s considered really important for people to have phone service.