It never seems to work, and it never seems to work for the reasons outlined in The Innovator's Dilemma. Big companies are held hostage by their customers. A new company needs to a.) find new customers b.) be hungry and c.) have total freedom to configure the market around oneself. None of these exist within the cushy environment of a big company - a.) is contradictory with maintaining Google's brand image, b.) is contradictory with continuing to pay the people involved in these efforts, and c.) is contradictory with Google getting first dibs on the spoils of these efforts.
What's wrong with that ?
There are only two YC companies that have gone public and both of those are still losing money -- PagerDuty and Dropbox and as far as I know, none have reached profitability.
If Google/Alphabet does too many investments which fail shareholders will cry.
Medical. I would provide FDA approval process funding and indemnification for medical devices.
Medical is rife with areas that could be disrupted by startups. The blocking limitation is that you can't afford the funding to get clearance for your product.
While I have lots of beef with the FDA and could easily write encyclopedic tomes on the subject, there is practically no other agency anywhere that actually makes sure before the fact that drugs or devices are actually better than nothing and actually fit for purpose.
The biggest problem is that the FDA could move much faster if they had a way to do detailed monitoring on things after approval. Alas, there is no incentive or system to handle that.
"... when we look at CAPEX and R&D as a percentage of revenue ... over the past 25 years, we see that the overall investment intensity of S&P 500 firms, while quite volatile on a year-to-year basis, has been rising over the past decade, and is now near peak levels not seen since the late 1990s."
If you had $25B to start a company what idea would you tackle?