Re:Machine Learning That’s Light Enough for an Arduino
by cr0sh on Thursday August 01, 2019 @07:31PM
(#20589358)
> "Arduino" is the company
I'd argue it's more the "ecosystem" today, rather than just the organization/company (or the "board").
In many cases, if you want your microcontroller to gain wide acceptance in the hobbyist community (if you're targeting it), you have to provide a "core" or something similar for the official IDE.
At one time, "arduino" meant "ATMega168/328 carrier board loved by hobbyists and despised by everyone else" - but those days are long, long past.
In fact - I think there's a core available for the SoC on the Raspberry Pi - ah (well, something):
I'd argue it's more the "ecosystem" today, rather than just the organization/company (or the "board").
In many cases, if you want your microcontroller to gain wide acceptance in the hobbyist community (if you're targeting it), you have to provide a "core" or something similar for the official IDE.
At one time, "arduino" meant "ATMega168/328 carrier board loved by hobbyists and despised by everyone else" - but those days are long, long past.
In fact - I think there's a core available for the SoC on the Raspberry Pi - ah (well, something):
https://github.com/me-no-dev/RasPiArduino