Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR
by dash2 on Sunday July 28, 2019 @03:22AM
(#20546269)
Socioeconomic status (SES) _is_ primarily your family's money. Where it comes from might easily include your family's genetics, e.g. genetics for intelligence. The parent's point, I think, was that controlling for SES in studies of the effect of intelligence on outcomes is likely to be a mistake, because SES itself will be caused by parental intelligence, which correlates with own intelligence via genetic (and other) pathways.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR
by bayesian_horse on Sunday July 28, 2019 @11:57AM
(#20548166)
In my opinion the link between intelligence and economic success is hugely overestimated...
A strong belief in "meritocracy" leads to a lot of cognitive biases.
Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR
by quotemstr on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:26AM
(#20551727)
I'm very tired of people demanding that I believe obvious nonsense like this claim that differences in skill don't exist or that differences in skill don't affect material outcomes. I get that you don't like meritocracy, but I'm not going to accept claims that it's some kind of myth. Hard work and talent leads to success.