News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by dkersten on Saturday July 27, 2019 @02:44PM (#20543454)
The best content I’ve found in recent years has been either on sites that don’t contain advertisement (because they’re someone’s personal hobby blog, for example, or HN) or from videos where the person was supported directly by fans through Patreon.

Anecdotally, the advertisement-supported content is mostly garbage.

Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by jefftk on Saturday July 27, 2019 @06:41PM (#20544702)
HN does have ads. They're job ads for YC companies, and they're the entries you see without an option to vote on. Ones like "Come eat – I mean build with the ZeroCater (YC W11) engineering team".
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by mlguy456 on Saturday July 27, 2019 @09:29PM (#20545336)
That's an example what ads should be. They are relevant, appropriate, they don't try to fool you or spy on you.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by 18pfsmt on Saturday July 27, 2019 @05:34PM (#20544330)
I believe your comment and Godel_unicode's are both correct, and I am pro-choice. Some people may prefer adverts over payment. I don't agree, but that is their choice. I can't stand to hear from NPR's underwriters any more, and will start singing songs loudly (I'm a bad singer to boot) when they come on. In other words, I am personally ad-adverse. My 80-something parents, however, don't even mute the channel, let alone change it, when watching TV and the advertising starts (it drives me nuts). Some people don't mind, and I think they have a right not to be denied content via advertising if that is an "offer on the table."

If one looks at the history of the HBO cable channel vs. broadcast channels (i.e. ABC, NBC, and CBS), and also Netflix, I think one can see there are similar dynamics at play.

The chaos of freedom is a beautiful thing, but using the government to enforce your version of utopia is scary.

Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by TeMPOraL on Sunday July 28, 2019 @03:01AM (#20546214)
Being pro-choice about advertising is like being pro-choice about influenza. Advertising is an infectious disease, it does not respect the choices of those who'd prefer to pay up front, and people underestimate its danger to young, old and weakened individuals.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by Godel_unicode on Saturday July 27, 2019 @03:31PM (#20543683)
You should check out Neil Degrasse Tyson on YouTube. Or virtually any podcast.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by orhmeh09 on Saturday July 27, 2019 @04:18PM (#20543921)
I listen to maybe a dozen podcasts. None have ads; most of them I support on Patreon.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by Godel_unicode on Saturday July 27, 2019 @05:10PM (#20544217)
It's unclear to me what that has to do with my point; the existence of high quality patreon-backed podcasts doesn't mean anything about the supply of quality advertising-supported podcasts. You should look into it, there are a lot of them.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by 18pfsmt on Saturday July 27, 2019 @07:06PM (#20544795)
I listen to ad-supported material, I just have muscle memory, and a visceral reaction to advertising where I will just advance VLC's playback by 1min via shortcut-key (assuming one uses a standard RSS reader and DLs the mp3 file locally).

I'm not sure I understand the point of saying you listen to non-ad-supported podcast, and not mentioning how they are supported or if it's pure hobbyist stuff you listen to.

Advertising comes in many forms (i.e. native content), and unless you link your .opml file, I can't ascertain the value of your statement. I do not recommend doing so, but young tech people think it's OK to put your real name on the internet (which is contrary to the ideas I was taught in the 90s; the use of pseudonyms has proven sound given our current circumstances).

Re:Adblocking: How about Nah? by indymike on Sunday July 28, 2019 @02:49PM (#20549173)
Many podcasts are 100% advertorial content. The ad is the podcast.