Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded
by p1esk on Thursday July 25, 2019 @07:59PM
(#20531077)
I'm not against modeling aspects of the brain based on what we know, just don't call that "whole brain" simulation/model.
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded
by marmaduke on Friday July 26, 2019 @01:44AM
(#20532649)
What would you call SimCity if not a city simulator?
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded
by AstralStorm on Friday July 26, 2019 @05:11AM
(#20533430)
It's a city simulator, not specific city simulator or even close. It is not accurate either as accuracy was not the main goal, but fun.
Human brain is a very specific and complex brain which we do not understand - vastly less than even cities at any scale. And to produce any useful answers, the model has to be accurate to some degree - and we don't know how much. HBP indeed had no question which it tried to answer - it's more like climbing a mountain because it exists.
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded
by p1esk on Friday July 26, 2019 @12:44PM
(#20536127)
I have no problem with calling SimCity a “whole city” simulator. Why? Because we have a good functional model of a city. We understand its operation on any level. Not the case with the brain.
Their website is https://nengo.ai and I am not affiliated with them just an alum that took his course.