https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37419572/if-async-await-...
https://blog.stephencleary.com/2013/11/there-is-no-thread.ht...
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/benwilli/2015/09/10/tasks-a...
I said that C# also uses Tasks which are scheduled onto these threads, which is what you said Julia does, so it's the same. C# can also start new threads just as easily, or use channels like Go with the TPL/Dataflow, System.Threading.Channels, actor frameworks, Reactive Extensions, or just chaining tasks together. Other than the depth-first algorithm, it seems like C# has the same capabilities as Julia and the others, if not more, and is much more "mainstream".
Can you explain how blocking functions are automatically yielded without keywords though? I cant find any documentation on this that doesnt mention the @async macro.
> "async/await in C#, which is concurrent but not parallel"
C# is multithreaded. Things can only be parallel if you have 2 separate paths of execution that don't depend on each other or any serial order, but you can also kick off millions of individual tasks in a single function and await them all too. These tasks are all scheduled onto threads in a managed threadpool that also share work and run at the same time. I fail to see how this is any different or less capable than the others you mentioned.