Well, whistleblowing, by definition, requires the target to be doing unsavory things. Otherwise, it's just "leaking" and many companies have ongoing problems with things like product plans being leaked.

Whistleblowing by definition means reporting something that (someone thinks) is unsavory. You can argue whether a given set of whistleblowers are misguided, but otherwise you don't call them whistleblowers.

Since you made both a condition, 99% of large corporations.

If you meant either/or, Patagonia. Clifs. Panera. In n out. There's way more but hopefully you get the point.

No need to rush to judgement, this will be an interesting case to follow,

> “It’s taken a long time to get to this point, and I remain steadfast regardless of any monetary outcome. The only thing we are guaranteed to take to our graves is our name. I’ve spent a career of integrity, and won’t stand idly by when someone like Elon Musk runs roughshod over others because he happens to be a billionaire.”

edit Please give me the courtesy of explaining downvotes. Thanks.