Re:Hackers breach FSB contractor, expose Tor deanonymization...
by wongarsu on Saturday July 20, 2019 @01:01PM
(#20486926)
The flipside of that is that it's reasonable to assume that most (not government run) TOR nodes are run at hosters offering cheap small VPS with cheap traffic and high bandwidth. That gives a few select datacenters where sniffing and correlating network traffic is extremely beneficial for deanonymizing TOR traffic. And if the datacenter operator doesn't cooperate and isn't vulnerable to covert sniffing there are always their uplink providers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hackers breach FSB contractor, expose Tor deanonymization...
by samstave on Saturday July 20, 2019 @01:42PM
(#20487190)
"That gives a few select datacenters where sniffing and correlating network traffic"
Uh,
This was the whole premise of Carnivore... installed in room 641A
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
(Btw - this is the room that Twitter was originally routed through...)
Basically I take the defeatest stance at this point...
There is NO privacy or anon. It doesnt exist any longer.