News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ministers pledge to end 'poor doors' in new build housing by hackeraccount on Saturday July 20, 2019 @08:51AM (#20485447)
It's inefficient. Imagine going to the grocery store - you go in and buy what you want.

Now imagine you were taking money from one person and going to the grocery store to buy for a second person. How much do you take? What do you buy? It adds a layer of ignorance to something straightforward.

It's true enough that sometimes that's necessary - what if the person you're buying food for will starve to death if you don't act? - but to my mind it's something you do because you have to and something you stop doing when you can.

Re:Ministers pledge to end 'poor doors' in new build housing by manicdee on Saturday July 20, 2019 @04:13PM (#20488049)
Completely irrelevant analogy.

Social housing doesn’t have to cater to whims and desires like whether someone wants gold taps. It’s not a question of how many bedrooms a person really desires, it’s like a soup kitchen where there is one dish on offer and that is better than starving in the street.

Social housing is far more efficient than the options of leaving people homeless in the street, or relying on industry to self regulate, or of passing regulations that X% of housing must conform to certain price limits while still being liveable.