> In my eyes, Docker is the epitome of crappy development. "Oh we don't care anymore, we just throw all into a container and be done with it."
That's actually the plan. We need to keep it running in legacy mode until the updated and patched version of the app is ready to be deployed. Main org IT don't want EOL and unsupported pieces in its infra anymore unless it can isolate it.
Next version is going to be service based and scalable. A WAMP installation can't do that.
Am I being trolled ? Because I don't see the people bashing docker or glorifying the values of an insecure but simple setup giving alternatives.
That's actually the plan. We need to keep it running in legacy mode until the updated and patched version of the app is ready to be deployed. Main org IT don't want EOL and unsupported pieces in its infra anymore unless it can isolate it.
Next version is going to be service based and scalable. A WAMP installation can't do that.
Am I being trolled ? Because I don't see the people bashing docker or glorifying the values of an insecure but simple setup giving alternatives.
What should we do then ?