Re:Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
by Pinbenterjamin on Friday July 19, 2019 @06:53PM
(#20483110)
That's the general direction I'd like to take. When we capture the inputs for the scrapers, I'd like to persist everything. Mouse jiggles, delays, idle time. I think it would definitely help advance the software.
Re:Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
by UweSchmidt on Friday July 19, 2019 @07:23PM
(#20483242)
In the grand scheme of things all of this is a wasteful process. Maybe you could direct your worklife towards other challenges that are more rewarding for society and equally profitable?
Re:Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
by pault on Friday July 19, 2019 @07:42PM
(#20483308)
I think that's unjustified and a little rude. OP is providing an automated service for publicly accessible data that isn't accessible for automation. If the sources are notified and they are operating within the confines of the law, this is no different than writing a search engine crawler.
That crosses into personal attack. Please don't do that on Hacker News. We've had to ask you this before.
Re:Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
by formercoder on Friday July 19, 2019 @08:12PM
(#20483436)
OP is being reasonably compensated for something that is perfectly legal.
The countermeasure would be to have a bunch of humans use the websites in any way they want, totally undirected, then use the totality of that browsing to facilitate your scraping probabilistically. It would be less efficient, but very difficult to catch.